Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In a recent article. J. P. Minda and J. D. Smith (2002; see record 2002-00620-002) argued that an exemplar model provided worse quantitative fits than an alternative prototype model to individual subject data from the classic D. L. Medin and M. M. Schaffer (1978) 5/4 categorization paradigm. In addition, they argued that the exemplar model achieved its fits by making untenable assumptions regarding how observers distribute their attention. In this article, we demonstrate that when the models are equated in terms of their response-rule flexibility, the exemplar model provides a substantially better account of the categorization data than does a prototype or mixed model. In addition, we point to shortcomings in the attention-allocation analyses conducted by J. P. Minda and J. D. Smith (2002). When these shortcomings are corrected, we find no evidence that challenges the attention-allocation assumptions of the exemplar model.
منابع مشابه
Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.
Exemplar theory was motivated by research that often used D. L. Medin and M. M. Schaffer's (1978) 5/4 stimulus set. The exemplar model has seemed to fit categorization data from this stimulus set better than a prototype model can. Moreover, the exemplar model alone predicts a qualitative aspect of performance that participants sometimes show. In 2 experiments, the authors reexamined these findi...
متن کاملRepresentational Shifts During Category Learning
Prototype and exemplar models form two extremes in a class of mixture model accounts of human category learning. This class of models allows flexible representations that can interpolate from simple prototypes to highly differentiated exemplar accounts. We apply one such framework to data that afford an insight into the nature of representational changes during category learning. While generall...
متن کاملTracking Variability in Learning: Contrasting Statistical and Similarity-Based Accounts
Learning to categorize objects involves learning which sources of variability are meaningful and which should be ignored or generalized. In this light, theories and models of category learning can be viewed as accounts of how people capture and represent meaningful variation. Similarity-based models, such as prototype and exemplar models, cannot correctly predict that humans classify a stimulus...
متن کاملPrototypes in the Mist: The Early Epochs of Category Learning
Recent ideas about category learning have favored exemplar processes over prototype processes. However, research has focused on small, poorly differentiated categories and on task-final performances—both may highlight exemplar strategies. Thus, we evaluated participants' categorization strategies and standard categorization models at successive stages in the learning of smaller, less differenti...
متن کاملComparisons between exemplar similarity and mixed prototype models using a linearly separable category structure.
Nosofsky and Zaki (2002) found that an exemplar similarity model provided better accounts of individual subject classification and generalization performance than did a mixed prototype model proposed by Smith and Minda (1998; Minda & Smith, 2001). However, these previous tests used a nonlinearly separable category structure. In the present work, the authors extend the previous findings by demon...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
دوره 29 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003